Obstetrics Research - Caesarean Delivery, Child Birth, Labour

Obstetrics Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Obstetrics, including details on caesarean delivery, child birth, labour.


Obstetrics Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Obstetrics

Books on Obstetrics

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Tensile properties of five commonly used mid-urethral slings relative to the TVTtrade mark.

Moalli PA, Papas N, Menefee S, Albo M, Meyn L, Abramowitch SD

Magee-Womens Research Institute and the Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology at Magee Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, 300 Halket Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA, pmoalli@mail.magee.edu.

We characterized the tensile properties of five mid-urethral slings relative to the Gynecare TVTtrade mark. Slings were divided and loaded to failure. The heat-sealed Boston Scientific mid-section and the American Medical Systems (AMS) tensioning suture were examined separately. Analysis of the resulting nonlinear load elongation curves included calculation of low and high stiffness, the transition point between them (inflection point), load at failure, and relative elongation. Permanent elongation was measured after repetitive loads. Mean values were compared using a one-way analysis of variance. The curves of the Gynecare, Boston Scientific (no midsection) and AMS (no suture) were nonlinear with similar low stiffness and inflection points. The Bard, Caldera, and Mentor slings were stiffer. Heat sealing the Boston Scientific mid-section increased stiffness, while the AMS suture had negligible effect. Cyclical loading induced permanent elongation that was similar for Gynecare, AMS, and Boston Scientific (without mid-section) and lower for Bard, Caldera, and Mentor. With the exception of AMS, the overall effect of newer sling modifications was an increase in tensile stiffness.

Published 8 April 2008 in Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 19(5): 655-63.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2005-2008 Obstetrics Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Obstetrics Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2005)
  Issue 1 (October)
  Issue 2 (November)
  Issue 3 (December)

Volume 2 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)



Obstetrics Books

The Complete Book of Pregnancy and Childbirth (Revised)

The Complete Book of Pregnancy and Childbirth (Revised)