Obstetrics Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Obstetrics, including details on caesarean delivery, child birth, labour. | ||||||||
|
Abortion training in Canadian obstetrics and gynecology residency programs.Roy G, Parvataneni R, Friedman B, Eastwood K, Darney PD, Steinauer J University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada. OBJECTIVE: To study abortion training in Canadian obstetrics and gynecology (ob-gyn) residency programs. METHODS: An anonymous questionnaire was sent to all postgraduate year (PGY)-4 and PGY-5 ob-gyn residents (n=130) and residency program directors (n=16) in Canada. The questionnaires inquired about demographic information, details of abortion training, resident participation in training, and intention to provide abortions after residency. RESULTS: Ninety-two of 130 residents (71%) and 15 of 16 program directors (94%) responded. Abortion training is considered routine in approximately half of programs and elective in half. The majority of residents (71%) participated in abortion training, and half plan to do elective abortions after residency. More than half of residents felt competent after training to perform first-trimester aspiration and second-trimester inductions but did not feel competent in first-trimester medical abortions or dilation and evacuation (D&E). Residents were more likely to participate in training if the program arranged the training for residents (P=.04) and were more likely to intend to provide abortions if the training was considered routine (P=.02), while controlling for all significant demographic and training variables. CONCLUSION: Most Canadian ob-gyn programs offer some training in elective abortion, but only half include it routinely in training, and the minority of residents feels competent in D&E and medical abortion. Integrated abortion training was associated with greater resident participation in training and increased likelihood of intention to provide abortions after residency. Published 1 August 2006 in Obstet Gynecol, 108(2): 309-14.
© 2005-2008 Obstetrics Research Today. All Rights Reserved. |
| ||||||