Obstetrics Research - Caesarean Delivery, Child Birth, Labour

Obstetrics Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Obstetrics, including details on caesarean delivery, child birth, labour.


Obstetrics Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Obstetrics

Books on Obstetrics

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Routine ultrasound screening and detection of congenital anomalies outside a university setting.

Nakling J, Backe B

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oppland Central Hospital, Lillehammer, Norway. jakob.nakling@sykehuset-innlandet.no

BACKGROUND. To assess the sensitivity for detecting fetal congenital anomalies by a routine ultrasound examination program at midtrimester performed in an unselected population by midwives and specialists in obstetrics and gynecology. METHODS. Six hundred seventy-six of the pregnancies had the midtrimester ultrasound examinations performed outside the county. Three hundred seventeen of the women had midtrimester ultrasound examinations performed in the county, but delivered outside the county. A total of 18 181 pregnancies were eligible for the study. RESULTS. Altogether there were 267 fetuses and newborns with anomalies, which gives a prevalence of 1.5%. One hundred three of the 267 anomalies were detected at the midtrimester ultrasound examination, yielding a sensitivity of 39.0%. There were 11 false positives and 163 remained undiagnosed (false negatives), which gives a specificity of 99.9% and a positive predictive value of 90.4%. The sensitivity for detecting anomalies ranged from 74.4 to 8.3% according to the organ system of the fetus. CONCLUSIONS. Our study shows that midtrimester routine ultrasound examination in district hospitals can achieve a detection rate of congenital anomalies comparable with tertiary centers. One-stage ultrasound examination at midtrimester gives acceptable results concerning congenital anomalies with few false-positive results.

Published 19 October 2005 in Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 84(11): 1042-8.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2005-2008 Obstetrics Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Obstetrics Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2005)
  Issue 1 (October)
  Issue 2 (November)
  Issue 3 (December)

Volume 2 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)



Obstetrics Books

Ultrasonography in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Ultrasonography in Obstetrics and Gynecology